Almost any type of business transaction which involves
more than one country will attract tax, and probably tax in all the countries
involved. Supplying technical services to a customer in Cambodia, for example, will be subject to a 14%
withholding tax in Cambodia
on the fee paid, while the service supplier will also be taxed on that same
income in his home country. Expatriate employees sent to Cambodia on assignments will pay
salary tax (top rate 20%) on their remuneration, but often their home country
will include the same “Cambodian” salary to calculate the total taxable income
as well. Double taxation agreements are heralded as the appropriate instrument
to reduce this kind of double taxation and they are very widespread indeed.
Most developed countries have more than a hundred double tax treaties, while
developing countries as Thailand
and Indonesia
have over 50 treaties in force.
Unavoidable but When?
Until now, Cambodia did not conclude any tax
treaties. That is not surprising, since income taxation itself is relatively
new and the current “Law on Taxation” is only in force for less than a decade.
It’s no use thinking about ways to avoid double taxation if the rules of the
internal tax system itself are not yet clearly established, so to say. But
there is definitely an interest, especially from Cambodia’s major trade partners.
Also within ASEAN a recommendation was adopted for all members to pursue tax
treaties with each other. Justified or not, double taxation agreements are seen
as an essential part of the “package of international legal standards” aimed at
economic development just like WTO agreements, protection of investments,
recognition and enforcement of international arbitration awards, protection of
intellectual property rights, and the like.
With Which Countries?
Tax treaties for Cambodia are thus just a matter of
time. But it may be expected that Cambodia will commence negotiations
with a strict agenda. In all tax treaties, both states give up tax revenue in
the hope that the increase in trade and investment will make up for the loss.
But this balance is distorted in the case of Cambodia, which is a capital
importer and which may lose more than the other state if that is a capital
exporter. This can be to a large extent prevented by insisting on specially
drafted rules in the treaty and by not reducing withholding taxes. At the
negotiating table Cambodia
will thus have to stick to its agenda in that regard in order not to lose tax
revenue which it cannot afford.
Keeping that in mind, which countries will Cambodia
conclude tax treaties with first? First of all, negotiating and concluding an
actual tax treaty will easily take between one and three year before entry into
force. It does not matter if Cambodia
starts with a large country or a little one, as long as the outcome achieves
the objectives of Cambodia
in terms of not giving up too much and not creating loopholes for tax avoidance
and evasion.
Sectors Likely to Benefit
Supposing those treaties are in force, which companies
or sectors are likely to benefit? Probably, it will be easier for foreign
companies that sell goods or services through connections or staff present in Cambodia
to stay out of the scope of Cambodian taxation. Foreign construction companies
on projects in Cambodia, for
example, will only be taxable in Cambodia under treaty rules if the
project passes a certain time period. Certain types of branches will be exempt
from tax all together (even minimum tax), such as branches that only purchase
raw materials or collect information for their foreign head office.
Foreign Employees
Also, expatriate employees on short term assignments
will in most cases benefit from tax exemption in Cambodia under treaty rules.
Typically, when an expat is sent to Cambodia
for a period less than 6 months, his salary will remain untaxed in Cambodia
if some other conditions are also respected. Interestingly, this tax exemption
will even apply if that salary is also exempt from tax in his home country,
which may often happen when he is paid by an entity in a third country.
Transfer Pricing
Another important benefit for the business community
is protection on transfer pricing adjustments. Both tax authorities are under a
tax treaty bound to apply the same international rules and practices on
re-assessing prices on transactions between group companies. It may be
confusing and complicated for companies to go through tax audits in various
countries when tax authorities apply different or less than transparent rules
on re-adjusting the taxable profit of the company. There is even a procedure
under the treaty, a remedy open to taxpayers when a tax authority fails to
apply those international rules.
Benefits for Tax Department
But the real winner, in my view, would be the
Cambodian tax authorities themselves. Provided the treaties are carefully
negotiated, and if necessary treaties with too demanding countries are simply
not concluded, actual loss of revenue will be minimal. But the Tax Department
stands to gain a wealth of new information. Under tax treaties, both tax
authorities exchange information on individual taxpayers such as income, sales
prices, profit margins, shareholders, costs and expenses, etc. For Cambodia’s tax officials, who have little
resources at their disposal, getting this information on companies that do
business in or with Cambodia
will certainly help curbing international tax evasion. Information from abroad
may help determining, for example, the real profitability of manufacturing
companies that sell their finished products first to related companies before
they are resold to actual customers.
In any event, double taxation agreements will connect Cambodia’s
tax system with that of the world, for better or for worse. Both the taxpayer
and the tax administration will both have to adapt to that fundamentally new
situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment